July 21, 2025

Environmental Mitigation Delivered – Banking Dominates According to USACE Data

Mitigation Bank Credits continue to answer most of the nation’s most pressing environmental challenges – with real environmental restoration – with no temporal loss.

Graph shows Mitigation Banks (blue) and ILF Programs (red) 2015-2024 Withdrawn Mitigation Credits from those earned (Released).

Mitigation bank credits were the mitigation solution 92% of the time from 2015 to 2024 when compared to ILF program withdrawn (released/earned) credits according to U.S. Army Corps data. This new data demonstrates that successful, proven mitigation banks are relied upon to offset unavoidable impacts to our nations water and wetlands –  everywhere real environmental offset is the desired outcome.

Prior to the introduction of mitigation banking as a solution for permitted impacts, there was so little transparency that few people outside the industry realized the magnitude of project (offset) failures. In a study by the National Academy of Sciences in 2001, it was revealed that only about half of the required mitigation had ever been constructed and that compliance inspections were rarely done. Projects that had been completed often did not offset the permitted impacts. Severe regulatory staff shortages were common. Thousands of impacts were permitted each year that were never offset.  Actual Replacement values were estimated as low as 20%. Tens of thousands of acres of wetlands continued to be destroyed annually.  This report and the many mitigation failures, a number of which were highly publicized, ultimately gave rise to the 2008 Final Mitigation Rule.

Environmental banking has demonstrated by thousands of projects across the United States that it is the most successful program in the Nation's history for restoring and protecting the environment. It is extremely rare for a bank to fail. The industry's continued expansion presents the very real potential to reverse the continued march of environmental destruction.

You may also like

GAO Report Highlights Need for Greater Consistency in Mitigation Oversight

A newly released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report is shining a spotlight on a concern many in the mitigation banking industry have raised for years: inconsistent implementation of the federal compensatory mitigation program across U.S. Army Corps of Engineers districts.   Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Corps requires compensatory mitigation when permitted

Read More

Ending the False Choice: Why Mitigation Banking Strengthens Both Economy and Ecology

For too long, environmental policy debates have been framed around a false and unproductive premise: that economic growth and environmental protection are inherently at odds. This mindset is not only outdated—it is actively harmful to both outcomes. Mitigation banking offers a clear path forward. By design, it aligns economic incentives with ecological restoration, proving that well-functioning

Read More

Subscribe to our newsletter now!