“We’re all in this together to achieve real, in-the-ground restoration.”
That was the overarching message from regulators and consultants during the Association of State Wetland Managers’ (ASWM’s) Webinar: An Ecological Framework for Reviewing Compensatory Mitigation: Oversight and Compliance held recently.
Presenters Kristi Hall with
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg District, Sarah Woodford with the
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, and Ashley Zavagno with WRA, Inc.
in northern California all offered their perspectives on compensatory
mitigation oversight and compliance.
Speaking to a mixed
audience of project reviewers, regulators,
practitioners, and state and tribal wetland program staff, presenters placed an
emphasis on the use of mitigation banking as the preferred alternative for
compensatory mitigation, with minor mentions of in-lieu-fee and
permittee-responsible mitigation.
Hall, who was named the 2018 USACE’s Vicksburg District Regulator of the Year,
spoke first and promoted mutually beneficial solutions to compliance
issues. She encouraged regulators and
reviewers to recognize if a project is “trending toward success” and to avoid
placing blame. Instead, she said, go
back to the [mitigation banking] instrument and see what it
says.
“Sometimes nature doesn’t
do what we expect, and sometimes that can be okay,” she said. There is no
crystal ball, said Hall, and projects can experience climate failures or
unanticipated site failures, which can usually be addressed through a adaptive
management.
Sarah
Woodford, of Virginia DEQ echoed Hall with regard to everyone working together
to find compliance solutions. DEQ has to verify overall compliance and track
credit releases for mitigation banks. Woodford said regular interagency review
team (IRT) meetings are important along with regular site visits. She encouraged reporting any problems early
to the IRT.
The only consultant presenter, Ashley
Zavagno or WRA, Inc, said, “mitigation is complicated” and identified the
importance of clarity, efficiency certainty, parity, and consistency with
regard to communication between regulators, practitioners and bank sponsors.
“We want to do the right thing and meet
your expectations,” said Zavagno speaking to regulators attending the webinar.
“Help us help you.”
According to the ASWM website, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) was interested in developing a webinar training
series with topics that go beyond what is currently available at the National
Interagency Review Team course or in Corps Regulatory Mitigation Workshops. The
purpose of the webinars is to develop and provide advanced training materials
for current and future Corps regulatory staff engaged in reviewing, approving
and monitoring compensatory mitigation.
While
this webinar was supposed to be the last one of the series, Marla Stelk, ASWM
Executive Director, told THI there is one more webinar planned. The last
webinar will be held early next year, and will be on the topic of property interests,
such as water and mineral rights, that may affect mitigation projects.
To hear the entire webinar series go to ASWM’s website.
You may also like
The National Environmental Banking Association (NEBA) is a professional organization focused on integrity, transparency, and accountability, promoting the highest standards in the environmental banking industry. Its members include mitigation banking professionals, industry vendors, and government officials, ensuring cost-effective outreach and support. Joining NEBA benefits you and your business, helping to grow the industry and improve
Read More
According to US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) data, there are more than 8 million Advance Mitigation Credits sitting on the ledgers of the many dozens of In-Lieu Fee (ILF) Programs across the United States today, nearly all of which are exempt from any financial assurance that the mitigation projects will actually be performed.
Read More