Mitigation bank credits are effective for offsetting impacts under the Clean Water Act (CWA) because they offer pre-approved, ecologically sound, and legally recognized compensation for unavoidable environmental impacts to waters and wetlands. Here’s why they work so well:
Credits are only released once the mitigation bank meets certain performance standards (e.g., restored wetland functions), ensuring ecological gains are real and measurable before they’re used to offset impacts.
Banks go through a rigorous review and approval process by an Inter-Agency Review Team (IRT), including the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This reduces uncertainty for both regulators and permit applicants.
Permittees buy credits rather than designing, permitting, and maintaining their own mitigation projects. This speeds up the approval process and shifts long-term responsibility to the bank sponsor.
Banks often consolidate small, fragmented efforts into larger, more ecologically valuable sites—creating better outcomes for species, hydrology, and water quality.
Credits can only be used within a specific service area, ensuring mitigation occurs in proximity to the impact, preserving watershed integrity.
To learn more – Join Us
Award for Excellence
We invite you to submit a nomination for NEBA's 2025 Awards for Excellence in mitigation banking and public service. The awards recognize those who have demonstrated extraordinary commitment to the mitigation banking and the regulatory community.
A newly released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report is shining a spotlight on a concern many in the mitigation banking industry have raised for years: inconsistent implementation of the federal compensatory mitigation program across U.S. Army Corps of Engineers districts. Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the Corps requires compensatory mitigation when permitted
Read MoreFor too long, environmental policy debates have been framed around a false and unproductive premise: that economic growth and environmental protection are inherently at odds. This mindset is not only outdated—it is actively harmful to both outcomes. Mitigation banking offers a clear path forward. By design, it aligns economic incentives with ecological restoration, proving that well-functioning
Read More